Klinik Laboratuvarlar İçin Metot Verifikasyonu
Synopsis
Verifikasyon, klinik laboratuvarlarda yöntemlerin üretici performans gerekliliklerini karşılayıp karşılamadığını değerlendirerek yüksek kaliteli ve güvenilir test sonuçları elde edilmesini sağlayan kritik bir süreçtir. Uluslararası standartlar ve düzenlemeler, cihazların ve yöntemlerin klinik uygulama öncesinde kesinlik, doğruluk, doğrusallık ve referans aralık gibi performans parametrelerinin değerlendirilmesini şart koşar. Bu parametreler, özellikle Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) gibi uluslararası standartlar doğrultusunda detaylı bir şekilde incelenmiştir. CLSI EP15A3 rehberi, kesinlik ve doğruluğun aynı deneyde değerlendirilmesini sağlayarak verifikasyon sürecini kolaylaştıran ve zamandan tasarruf sağlayan bir yöntem sunmaktadır. EP6’nın yeni versiyonu, doğrusallık analizlerinde ağırlıklı en küçük kareler doğrusal regresyon analizinin, verimliliği artırması, gereksiz çalışmaları azaltması ve laboratuvar iş akışını optimize etmesi nedeniyle kullanılmasını önermektedir. Referans aralıkları, genellikle referans popülasyonunun merkezi %95'lik dilimini esas alır ve güvenilir kaynaklardan alınan aralıklar, uygun örneklem kullanılarak doğrulanabilir. Bu süreçler, laboratuvarların uluslararası standartlara uygunluk sağlamasına ve klinik uygulamalarda güvenilir sonuçlar sunmasına olanak tanır. Bu hesaplamalar, hata kaynaklarının belirlenmesine ve hata payının klinik kararları etkilemeyecek düzeyde tutulmasına katkı sağlar. Verifikasyon çalışmaları, laboratuvarlarda kalite güvencesini artırmak, olası hata kaynaklarını kontrol altına almak ve klinik karar süreçlerini desteklemek açısından büyük önem taşımaktadır.
Verification is a critical process in clinical laboratories that ensures methods meet manufacturer performance requirements, enabling the production of high-quality and reliable test results. International standards and regulations mandate the evaluation of performance parameters, such as precision, trueness, linearity, and reference intervals, before clinical implementation of devices and methods. These parameters have been thoroughly examined, particularly within international standards such as those provided by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). The CLSI EP15A3 guideline provides a method that simplifies the verification process and saves time by enabling simultaneous assessment of precision and trueness within the same experiment. The new version of EP6 recommends weighted least-squares linear regression analysis for linearity assessments, as it enhances efficiency, reduces unnecessary work, and optimizes workflows. Reference intervals typically rely on a reference population's central 95% range and can be verified using appropriate sampling from reliable sources. These processes ensure that laboratories comply with international standards and provide reliable results for clinical applications. These calculations facilitate the identification of error sources and ensure that error margins are maintained at levels that do not compromise clinical decisions. Verification studies are essential for improving laboratory quality assurance, controlling potential sources of error, and supporting clinical decision-making.
References
Hand M, Crampton A, Thomas A, et al. A survey of clinical laboratory instrument verification in the UK and New Zealand. Ann Clin Biochem. 2019;56(2):275-282. doi:10.1177/0004563218823804
International Standards Organisation. Medical laboratories—Requirements for quality and competence International Standard, ISO 15189, 3rd (ed) 2012.
National Association of Testing Authorities, Australia. Interpretation of NPAAC Requirements and ISO 15189: medical testing field application document: requirements for accreditation. 2013.
ISO 15189:2014(EN). (n.d.) Medical Laboratories—Particular Requirements for Quality and Competence.
ISO/IEC 17025:2017(EN). (n.d.) General Requirements for the Competence of Testing and Calibration Laboratories.
College of American Pathologists. CAP, Accreditation Program—All Common Checklist, 2015.
Westgard JO, Ehrmeyer SS, Darcy TP. CLIA final rules for quality systems. Quality assessment issues and answers, Madison, 2004.
Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical methods. 8th ed. Ames, Iowa: Iowa State University Press; 1989. p. 75, 121, 140–2, 170–4, 177, 237–8, 279.
Linnet K, Moons K GM, Boyd JC. Statistical Methodologies in Laboratory Medicine. In: Ellervik C, Tacker D, Zha L (eds.) Tietz Textbook of Clinical Chemistry and Molecular Diagnostics. 7th ed., Elsevier, St. Louis, Missouri, 2023. p. 17-19.
CLSI. User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. CLSI document EP15-A3. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2014.
Chakravarthy SN, Ramanathan S, S S, et al. EP15A3 Based Precision and Trueness Verification of VITROS HbA1C Immunoassay. Indian J Clin Biochem. 2019;34(1):89-94. doi:10.1007/s12291-017-0712-z
Aguirre JJ, Ness K, Algeciras-Schimnich A. Application of the CLSI EP15-A3 Guideline as an Alternative Troubleshooting Tool for Verification of Assay Precision. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 2019;152(Supplement_1):S88-S. doi:10.1093/ajcp/aqz117.007
lglewicz B, Hoaglin DC. 1944-How to Detect and Handle Outliers. ASQC Quality Press, Wis.:Milwaukee; 1993.
Barnett V, Lewis T. Outliers in Statistical Data. 3rd ed. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 1994.
Sandberg S, Fraser CG, Horvath AR, et al. Defining analytical performance specifications: Consensus Statement from the 1st Strategic Conference of the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53(6):833-835. doi:10.1515/cclm-2015-0067
Ceriotti F, Fernandez-Calle P, Klee GG, et al. Criteria for assigning laboratory measurands to models for analytical performance specifications defined in the 1st EFLM Strategic Conference. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2017;55(2):189-194. doi:10.1515/cclm-2016-0091
Aarsand AK, Fernandez-Calle P, Webster C, et al. The EFLM Biological Variation Database. Available from: https://biologicalvariation.eu/ [Accessed October 2024]
Westgard QC. Desirable biological variation database specifications. Desirable specifications for total error, imprecision, and bias, derived from intra- and inter individual biologic variation. Available from: https://www.westgard.com/biodatabase1.htm [Accessed October 2024]
Westgard QC. 2024 CLIA Acceptance Limits for Proficiency Testing. Available from: https://westgard.com/clia-a-quality/quality-requirements/2024-clia-requirements.html [Accessed October 2024]
Ehrmeyer SS, Laessig RH, Leinweber JE, et al. 1990 Medicare/CLIA final rules for proficiency testing: minimum intralaboratory performance characteristics (CV and bias) needed to pass. Clin Chem. 1990;36(10):1736-1740.
BIPM. JCTLM database: Laboratory medicine and in vitro diagnostics. https://www.bipm.org/jctlm/ [Accessed October 2024]
Killeen AA, Long T, Souers R, et al. Verifying performance characteristics of quantitative analytical systems: calibration verification, linearity, and analytical measurement range. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014;138(9):1173-1181. doi:10.5858/arpa.2013-0051-CP
Jeong TD, Kim SK, Kim S, et al. Comparison between polynomial regression and weighted least squares regression analysis for verification of analytical measurement range. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2022;60(7):989-994. doi:10.1515/cclm-2022-0018
CLSI. Evaluation of Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures. 2nd ed. CLSI guideline EP06. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2020.
CLSI. Evaluation of the Linearity of Quantitative Measurement Procedures: A Statistical Approach; Approved Guideline. CLSI document EP06-A. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2003.
Ozarda Y, Ichihara K, Barth JH, Klee G; Committee on Reference Intervals and Decision Limits (C-RIDL), International Federation for Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine. Protocol and standard operating procedures for common use in a worldwide multicenter study on reference values. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013;51(5):1027-1040. doi:10.1515/cclm-2013-0249
CLSI. Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. CLSI document EP28-A3c. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2008.
Hoffmann G, Klawitter S, Trulson I, et al. A Novel Tool for the Rapid and Transparent Verification of Reference Intervals in Clinical Laboratories. J Clin Med. 2024;13(15):4397. Published 2024 Jul 27. doi:10.3390/jcm13154397
Reed AH, Henry RJ, Mason WB. Influence of statistical method used on the resulting estimate of normal range. Clin Chem. 1971;17:275-284.
Dixon WJ. Processing data for outliers. Biometrics. 1953;9:74-89.
Tukey JW. Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley; 1977:688.
