Makale Yazımı Sırasında Kullanılması Önerilen Kontrol Listeleri
Özet
Bilimsel çalışmaların raporlama kalitesini, şeffaflığını ve güvenirliğini artırmak amacıyla geliştirilen çeşitli kontrol listeleri, araştırmacıların metodoloji ve bulgularını standart bir yapıda sunmalarına olanak tanır. CARE, PRISMA, STROBE ve CONSORT gibi farklı çalışma desenlerine özgü rehberler, hem yazarlar hem de editörler için sürecin her aşamasında paha biçilmez birer yol gösterici işlevi görür. Bu kılavuzların etkin kullanımı, çalışmalardaki yanlılığı azaltarak sonuçların bilimsel geçerliliğini güçlendirmekte ve sunulan kanıtlara duyulan güveni pekiştirmektedir.
Reporting checklists such as CARE, PRISMA, STROBE, and CONSORT enhance the quality and transparency of scientific studies by providing standardized frameworks for documenting methodologies and findings. These guidelines serve as essential resources for authors and editors, ensuring that research is reported comprehensively across various study designs. Adhering to these standards reduces bias, facilitates the evaluation of scientific validity, and ultimately strengthens the reliability of evidence presented in the literature.
Referanslar
Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2007; 85: 867-872.
Sporbeck B, Jacobs A, Hartmann V, et al. Methodological standards in medical reporting. JDDG: Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft. 2013; 11(2): 107-120. doi: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ddg.12000
Mundi R, Chaudhry H, Singh I, et al. Checklists to improve the quality of the orthopaedic literature. Indian journal of orthopaedics. 2008; 42(2): 150. doi:10.4103/0019-5413.40251
Dewey M, Levine D, Bossuyt PM, et al. Impact and perceived value of journal reporting guidelines among Radiology authors and reviewers. European radiology. 2019; 29(8): 3986-3995.
Gagnier JJ, Kienle G, Altman DA, et al. The CARE Guidelines: consensus-based clinical case reporting guideline development. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2013; 7: 223.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Annals of internal medicine. 2009; 151(4): 264-269.
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal of Surgery. 2021; 88: 105906. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration. Annals of internal medicine. 2003; 138(1): W1-12. doi:10.1373/49.1.7
Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. STARD 2015: an updated list of essential items for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies. Clinical chemistry. 2015; 61(12): 1446-1452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h5527
Des Jarlais DC, Lyles C, Crepaz N, et al. Improving the reporting quality of nonrandomized evaluations of behavioral and public health interventions: the TREND statement. American journal of public health. 2004; 94(3): 361-366. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.3.361
Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet. 2001;357:1191-4.
Kilkenny C, Browne WJ, Cuthill IC, et al. Improving bioscience research reporting: the ARRIVE guidelines for reporting animal research. PLoS biology. 2010; 8(6): e1000412.
Kottner J, Audigé L, Brorson S, Donner A, Gajewski BJ, Hróbjarttson A et al. Guidelines for reporting reliability and agreement studies (GRRAS) were proposed. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64: 96-106. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.03.002
