Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanılan Ağız İçi Tarayıcı Sistemleri
Synopsis
CAD/CAM sistemleri diş hekimine direk ve indirek ölçü yöntemi imkanı sağlamaktadır. Direk ölçüde hastadan ağız içi kameralarla tarama yapılıp freze ünitesinde üretim yapılabiliken, indirek ölçüde hastadan alınan konvansiyonel ölçüden elde edilen alçı modellerin ağız dışı tarayıcı ile taranıp freze ünitesinde üretilmesi söz konusudur. Bu kitap bölümünde güncel ağız içi tarayıcı sistemleri ve çalışma prensipleri hakkında bilgiler yer almaktadır.
References
Kim RJ-Y, Park J-M, Shim J-S. Accuracy of 9 intraoral scanners for complete-arch image acquisition: A qualitative and quantitative evaluation. The Journal of prosthetic dentistry. 2018;120(6):895-903. e1.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017;2017.
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann W, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2015;18(2):101-29.
Robles-Medina M, Romeo-Rubio M, Salido MP, Pradíes G. Digital intraoral impression methods: an update on accuracy. Current Oral Health Reports. 2020;7:361-75.
Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Governi L, Caponi M, Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5:0-.
Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137:5S-6S.
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2008;29(8):494, 6, 8-505.
Kostiukova V, Riakhovskiĭ A, Ukhanov M. Comparative study of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Stomatologiia. 2014;93(1):53-9.
Skramstad M. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC Willkommen Cerec Primescan AC. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):69-78.
Al-Hassiny H. Review of the intraoral scanners at IDS 2019. Cologne: Institute of Digital Dentistry. 2019.
Ting‐shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(4):313-21.
Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2017;17:1-13.
Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2020;20(1):1-21.
Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2010;38(5):323-30.
Galhano GÁP, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(6):e575-e9.
Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2007;28(8):422-4, 6.
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21.
Cincioğlu M. Dental implantların dijital ölçü netliğine etki eden faktörlerin araştırılması.
Gurpinar B, Tak O. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022;127(3):430-7.
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(7):553-9.
Richert R, Goujat A, Venet L, Viguie G, Viennot S, Robinson P, et al. Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression. Journal of healthcare engineering. 2017;2017.
Zimmermann M, Mehl A, Mörmann W, Reich S. Intraoral scanning systems-a current overview. International journal of computerized dentistry. 2015;18(2):101-29.
Robles-Medina M, Romeo-Rubio M, Salido MP, Pradíes G. Digital intraoral impression methods: an update on accuracy. Current Oral Health Reports. 2020;7:361-75.
Logozzo S, Franceschini G, Kilpela A, Governi L, Caponi M, Blois L. A comparative analysis of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Internet Journal of Medical Technology. 2011;5:0-.
Rekow ED. Dental CAD/CAM systems: a 20-year success story. The Journal of the American Dental Association. 2006;137:5S-6S.
Birnbaum NS, Aaronson HB. Dental impressions using 3D digital scanners: virtual becomes reality. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2008;29(8):494, 6, 8-505.
Kostiukova V, Riakhovskiĭ A, Ukhanov M. Comparative study of intraoral 3D digital scanners for restorative dentistry. Stomatologiia. 2014;93(1):53-9.
Skramstad M. Welcome to Cerec Primescan AC Willkommen Cerec Primescan AC. Int J Comput Dent. 2019;22(1):69-78.
Al-Hassiny H. Review of the intraoral scanners at IDS 2019. Cologne: Institute of Digital Dentistry. 2019.
Ting‐shu S, Jian S. Intraoral digital impression technique: a review. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2015;24(4):313-21.
Imburgia M, Logozzo S, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Mangano C, Mangano FG. Accuracy of four intraoral scanners in oral implantology: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2017;17:1-13.
Mangano FG, Admakin O, Bonacina M, Lerner H, Rutkunas V, Mangano C. Trueness of 12 intraoral scanners in the full-arch implant impression: a comparative in vitro study. BMC oral health. 2020;20(1):1-21.
Kachalia PR, Geissberger MJ. Dentistry a la carte: in-office CAD/CAM technology. Journal of the California Dental Association. 2010;38(5):323-30.
Galhano GÁP, Pellizzer EP, Mazaro JVQ. Optical impression systems for CAD-CAM restorations. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2012;23(6):e575-e9.
Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compendium of continuing education in dentistry (Jamesburg, NJ: 1995). 2007;28(8):422-4, 6.
Logozzo S, Zanetti EM, Franceschini G, Kilpelä A, Mäkynen A. Recent advances in dental optics–Part I: 3D intraoral scanners for restorative dentistry. Optics and Lasers in Engineering. 2014;54:203-21.
Cincioğlu M. Dental implantların dijital ölçü netliğine etki eden faktörlerin araştırılması.
Gurpinar B, Tak O. Effect of pulp chamber depth on the accuracy of endocrown scans made with different intraoral scanners versus an industrial scanner: An in vitro study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2022;127(3):430-7.
Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, Klein C, Cerny B, Brodesser J. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. Journal of dentistry. 2010;38(7):553-9.
Pages
17-24
Published
April 30, 2024
Copyright (c) 2024 Academician Publishing Book Portal
License
LicenseHow to Cite
1.
Ayata M. Diş Hekimliğinde Kullanılan Ağız İçi Tarayıcı Sistemleri. In: Kesim B, editor. Güncel Protetik Diş Tedavisi Çalışmaları VI (Bahar) [Internet]. Türkiye: Academician Publishing Book DOI Portal; 2024 [cited 2026 Jul. 13]. pp. 17-24. Available from: https://omp35.books.akademisyen.net/index.php/akya/catalog/book/3057/chapter/13605
